Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1 Description Over the duration of this course, you will submit a scholarly PowerPoint “Health Promotion Program Proposal,” addressing
Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1
Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1
Description
Over the duration of this course, you will submit a scholarly PowerPoint “Health Promotion Program Proposal,”
addressing existing nursing knowledge related to health promotion and a written proposal.
In the written proposal, you will also develop a health promotion program to meet the health needs of a vulnerable
population in your potential concentration area or community. The PowerPoint portion is your presentation of that proposal.
The proposal must demonstrate graduate school-level writing and critical analysis. The final version of
your proposal is due in week 8.
For this assignment you will submit Part One of your proposal, detailing a health problem that is
prevalent within your selected group and demonstrating your research of health promotion strategies for
addressing this specific health problem. At this point, you already developed in your discussions the core ideas of the topic contained in this assignment. You will use the same information, but it won’t be a copy-and-paste exercise. The purpose is that you enhance your ideas with the comments and outcomes of the weekly discussions and previous evaluations.
Directions
1. Introduction. Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction". (1 paragraph at least).
Using data and statistics, support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem.
What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program?
Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.
2. Describe the vulnerable population. (1-3 paragraphs).
What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population?
Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified.
3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals (at least 2) of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. (2 paragraphs, one for each article).
After completing a literature search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. (2-3 paragraphs).
4. Select and present an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical or conceptual model that best serves as the guiding framework for the proposal. (2-3 paragraphs).
For this assignment, a conclusion paragraph is not required.
Writing Assignment Requirements
Three to five pages in length MAXIMUM – do not exceed page limit- be concise (excluding title page, references, and appendices)
Follow APA format
Cite a minimum of 6 references
Please review the rubric prior to submission.
Sample APA paper for your reference:
APA 7 – Professional Sample Paper – 2020.pdf
REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.
Great resource to assist you: Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University
Submission
Text Editor
Word count: 0
Drag files here
Maximum size: 512 MB
or
Details & Information
Health Promotion Proposal, Part 1
Rubric Details
Maximum Score
100 points
Excellent
The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. All questions are answered thoroughly.
25
Satisfactory
The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. Questions were not fully developed but concepts are explained well.
20
Unsatisfactory
The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. There is a lack of development of questions.
15
Unacceptable
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. Cursory integration of knowledge and development of questions.
10
Excellent
The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis. The topic is consistently well thought out, thorough offers insight into the topic, and includes cited evidence to support the topic.
25
Satisfactory
The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position. The topic is somewhat well thought out, offers limited insight into the topic, but does not include cited evidence to support the topic.
20
Unsatisfactory
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.
15
Unacceptable
The topic is unclear or unrelated to the discussion topic with little or no supporting evidence.
10
Excellent
In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with the appropriate leveled headings headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
25
Satisfactory
In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. No leveled headings used to promote flow and cohesion. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and a conclusion in the submission.
20
Unsatisfactory
The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. There is an introduction and/or conclusion in the submission, but not both.
15
Unacceptable
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding of any relationship. There is NO introduction or conclusion in the submission.
10
Excellent
At least 6 current sources are used and are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. All references complete without DOI number.
8
Satisfactory
Used 5 current sources, which are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. 1 reference incomplete without DOI number.
6.4
Unsatisfactory
Used 4 current sources which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. 2 references incomplete without DOI number.
4.8
Unacceptable
Fewer than 4 current sources are used which are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. More than 2 references incomplete without DOI number.
