Project Portfolio and Project Management (MPMG405) Assignment Help
MPMG 405 Project Portfolio and Project
Management
Assessment Overview
Assessment
AT1 Individual Portfolio Proposal
Mark
Total 25
Due Date
11.55pm Friday, Week 5
Word limit
2500 words
Submission method
PDF file (.pdf) or Word (.doc), Via the Turnitin dropbox on eLearning
Other requirements
o Use 12 pt font
o Double-space your document to allow room for feedback
o State your student’s name, student number in the document header
o State the word count in the document
header
o Include a bibliography
o Comply with the APA referencing style
Assessment Details
For this assessment, you are required to prepare and submit a Portfolio Management proposal of 2500 words to the organisation chosen by your lecturer. The proposal consists in a critical analysis of the portfolio of the organisation and clearly indicates how the organisation can balance their Portfolio to achieve the organisation strategic objectives.
You are required to substantiate the analysis of your selected case with relevant literature and explanation.
Through the Portfolio Management Proposal students demonstrate an understanding of Portfolio Management, including Project Prioritisation, Resource allocation, and Risk Management.
The Individual Portfolio Proposal should be structured into the following sections: Structure of the Assessment
➢ Cover Page
➢ Executive Summary
➢ Table of Content
➢ Introduction and Organisation Background
Briefly introduce the purpose of the Portfolio.
Provide context and align with organisational strategy
Provide a roadmap of the sections covered in the report.
➢ Portfolio Structure and Components
Clearly outline the Portfolio’s Structure, including the types of components (programs and projects) included. Describe the governance framework, roles, and
responsibilities.
➢ Strategic Alignment
Describe how the Portfolio aligns with the Organisational Strategy
Identify how the portfolio supports business objectives
➢ Stakeholder Analysis
Identify key stakeholders and their interests or impacts on the portfolio
Describe strategies for stakeholder engagement and communication
➢ Risk Management Plan
Identify potential risks within the portfolio. Provide strategies for risk mitigation and management.
Resource Management Plan
Detail the approach for managing resources across the portfolio. Describe how resources will be allocated to maximise portfolio value.
➢ Performance Measurement and Monitoring
Describe the metrics and processes used to monitor and measure portfolio performance. Identify how performance data will be used for decision-making
➢ Change Management Process
Outline the process for managing changes within the portfolio. Describe how changes will be accessed, approved, and implemented.
➢ Extension and Realization Strategy
Explain how the Portfolio will evolve over time. Describe strategies for realising benefits and capturing value from the portfolio.
➢ Conclusion
Summarise the key findings of your analysis.
Highlight the potential impact of the Portfolio
➢ Reference list
Marking Criteria
Refer to marking rubric below
What if I Miss the Assessment?
You must complete the AT1 on the due date and time.
Late submissions: You may be penalised for failing to submit an assessment task on time. If you do not have authorisation, you may be penalised five (5) percent of awarded marks per day for up to five (5) days; thereafter your submission may not be accepted, and you may be awarded zero marks.
If you miss the AT1 ONLY for following reasons, you may apply for special consideration:
acute illness or
loss or bereavement or
hardship/trauma or
technological problems which could not be anticipated or avoided
To apply for special consideration, fill the following form and attach evidence to support your reason for seeking special consideration (with 5 days of the due date). o Special Consideration Application Form Link
If your reason is invalid, if you do not provide evidence, or your application is not made within 5 days of due date your application will be rejected, and you will lose 10 marks for this course.
Can I Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for this Assessment?
You may use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Co Pilot ONLY to research and brainstorm ideas and approaches for completing your essay. Please make sure to properly acknowledge any use of generative AI using CIM APA Referencing Guide.
Rubric for AT1 Individual Portfolio Proposal
Criteria
HD (85-100%)
D (75-84%)
C (65-74%)
P (50-64%)
F (0-49%)
Application of portfolio
management principles to
practice (10 marks)
Best portfolio management
practices are logically and
expertly incorporated in the
specific context of the case.
Best portfolio management
practices are logically and
adequately incorporated. Almost all recommendations are suitable for the specific context of the case.
Portfolio management practices are usually logical and
appropriately applied. Some aspects of the application are not accurate or suitable for the
specific context of the case.
The application of portfolio
management practices is
sometimes logical; however, some elements are inaccurate or not adequately incorporated.
No use of portfolio management principles and relevant best
practices. Poor or no inclusion of content or ideas relevant to the specific context of the case.
Critical thinking and synthesis of case information and referencing (10 marks)
Insightful coverage of all required tasks with an excellent
demonstration of critical thinking and analytical ability. The
analysis shows an expert use of relevant and recent sources of evidence correctly referenced according to APA 7th style to support the analysis presented.
Very good understanding of portfolio management. Response covers all required tasks with the demonstration of critical thinking ability. The analysis shows a skillful use of relevant and recent sources of evidence correctly referenced according to APA 7th style to support the analysis presented.
Good understanding of portfolio management and response
covers all required tasks. The analysis shows a generally good use of relevant sources of
evidence referenced according to APA 7th style to support the
analysis presented, with some inconsistencies or errors.
Generic responses to some
required tasks. The analysis shows limited skills in the use of sources of evidence or a scant use of sources of evidence
referenced according to APA 7th supporting the analysis presented with many errors.
The response does not cover most of the required tasks or is too descriptive and generalised. The analysis shows limited use of sources of evidence supporting the analysis presented, with sources used not referenced according to APA 7th.
Communication: Clarity of
exposition and written
communication skills (5 marks)
The purpose of the writing is clear, and there is strong
evidence of attention to the case’s details and consistent messaging. There are no errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
The purpose of the writing is clear, and there is good evidence of attention to the details of the case and mostly consistent
messaging. There are or may be few errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation
The purpose of writing is clear, with enough evidence of attention to the case’s details. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
The purpose of writing is not entirely clear, with limited
attention paid to the case’s
details. There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and
punctuation.
The purpose of writing is unclear, and there is minimal attention to the case’s details. There are too many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation.