Review at least two of your peers’ AI-generated articles ( see attached). Do not read the original articles for this step.
Discuss whether you believe the AI-generated articles show signs of bias and if you found any trigger words.
Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the AI-generated articles. Do they provide news more quickly, accurately, in more depth, or with more currency?
Start with a positive comment: What did your classmate do well in their presentation?
Identify the opposing viewpoint: Can you clearly identify the perspective your classmate is presenting, even if it differs from your own? If you are a Federalist how would you respond to an Anti-Federalist?
Clarify their argument: What key points or arguments did your classmate make to support their perspective? And offer your own perspective from the opposing side.
Address their evidence: Did your classmate provide evidence or examples to support their viewpoint? If so, evaluate the quality of this evidence.
Compare with your viewpoint: How does your perspective differ from your classmate’s? Can you provide counterarguments or alternative evidence that supports your viewpoint?
Respectful engagement: Ensure your feedback is respectful and constructive. Avoid personal attacks or disrespectful language.
Suggest improvements: Are there any areas in which your classmate’s presentation could be enhanced or clarified? Provide specific suggestions for improvement.
Apply received feedback: Reflect on the feedback you received on your own presentation. How can you apply this feedback to your next discussion?
The post Peer Review
Review at least two of your peers’ AI-generated articles ( see attac appeared first on Firstclass Academic Helpers..