IBUS2004 Assessment 1 Brief Assessment 1: Individual Written Essay (30%) Implications of International Business For Australian Stakeholders Case Overvie
IBUS2004 Managing International Business Assessment 1 Brief 2026 | UoN
IBUS2004 Assessment 1 Brief
Assessment 1: Individual Written Essay (30%)
Implications of International Business For Australian Stakeholders
Case Overview
Each student is required to submit an individual essay of approximately 2,000 words by Week 6. The purpose of this assessment is to assess students' capacity to demonstrate their theoretical knowledge and practical application of international trade theories and foreign direct investment theories.
Students are required to apply international trade and foreign direct investment theories in the analysis of the news relevant to international business published by credible outlets over the period of the first four weeks of the semester.
Assignment Topic
Choose two newspaper or periodical articles that are relevant to international business.
- Both articles must be published in the first 4 weeks of the semester.
- Articles must be sourced from Australian newspapers or periodicals (print or online editions).
- Ensure that both articles relate to major topic areas of international business (e.g., international trade, foreign direct investment, multinational operations, etc.).
- Include copies of both articles as appendices in your submission. These can be scanned originals or website links.
Using the two selected articles, write an essay that addresses the following tasks:
A. Analysis of Implications – Discuss the implications of each article for the following stakeholders:
a) The Australian Government
b) Australian domestic businesses
c) Multinational enterprises operating in Australia
B. Theoretical Application – Identify and explain the most relevant international business theory or theories (as covered in Chapter 5 of your textbook and Lectures 3 and 4 that can be used to analyse the content or issues in the articles.
- You may choose one theory per article (i.e., two different theories), or one theory that applies to both articles.
- Justify your selection and clearly explain how the theory supports your analysis.
Achieve Higher Grades of IBUS2004 Managing International Business Assessment 1 & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment
Assignment Specifications
1. Research and Referencing
Your essay must incorporate at least 10 unique references, which may include:
- Peer-reviewed academic journal articles
- Textbooks (including your course text)
- Reputable periodicals and newspapers
- Credible online sources (government, institutional, or scholarly websites)
You must use the APA 7th edition referencing style for in-text citations and your reference list.
2. Formatting and Submission Guidelines
- 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding cover page, executive summary, table of contents, reference list and appendices).
- Typed, double-spaced, with 12-point standard font (e.g., Times New Roman or Arial)
- Proofread for spelling, grammar, and clarity
- Submit your essay via the Canvas course site assignment submission box
3. Late Submission Policy
Late submissions without approval will incur a penalty of 10% per day, deducted from the total possible mark for the assignment. Assignments submitted more than five days late will not be accepted unless prior approval is obtained.
IBUS2004 Assessment Marking Criteria
The following marking criteria and marking rubric will be utilised when grading this assessment.
| Marks | Criteria | Unacceptable | Acceptable | Good | Very Good | Excellent |
| 3 | Introduction and the overview of the two chosen articles (10%) | The introduction is unclear, missing, or does not reflect the essay's content. | Provides a basic Introduction, though it may be vague or missing key elements. | Outlines the essay’s purpose and structure, though it may lack some clarity or detail. | Clearly outlines the essay’s purpose and structure. Provides a good summary of key points. | Provides a clear, concise, and engaging overview of the essay’s aims, structure, and key arguments. Sets up the essay effectively. |
| 21 | Content and Analysis:
Critical Analysis, Theory, Research and Argument (70%) |
Minimal or unclear analysis. Implications for government/ domestic and international firms are not addressed. Theories are missing, misapplied, or not justified. Minimal or inappropriate research. Sources are lacking or not used. The argument is difficult to follow or lacks logical structure.
|
Basic analysis with limited insight.
Some attempt to apply theory, but may lack clarity or relevance. Limited research. Few sources were used or not well integrated. Argument is present but may be disjointed or unclear. |
Sound analysis with some relevant insights. May lack depth in places. Theories are relevant but may be applied in a general or descriptive way. Adequate research with some relevant sources. The argument is understandable but may lack clarity in places. | Strong analysis with clear insights into implications. Theories are well chosen and applied with good justification.
Good range of relevant sources used effectively. The argument is clear and mostly well-structured. |
Insightful and well-developed analysis of implications. Theories are expertly selected and applied. Justification is strong and clearly supports the analysis.
Demonstrates wide and relevant reading. Sources are high-quality and well-integrated. Argument is logical, welldeveloped and cohesive. |
| 3 | Conclusion (10%)
|
Conclusion is missing, unclear, or introduces new, unrelated content. | Provides a basic conclusion. May be repetitive or introduce minor new ideas.
|
Summarises main points, though may lack clarity or strong linkage to the body. | Provides a clear conclusion that summarises key points and links to the essay content. | Provides a strong, well-integrated conclusion that clearly
summarises key findings and links back to the essay body. No new information introduced. |
| 3 | Presentation &
Referencing (10%) |
Poorly presented. Frequent grammar or spelling errors. Referencing is incorrect or missing. | Presentation is adequate but contains noticeable errors. APA referencing attempted, but with several issues. | Generally well-presented with some errors in grammar or referencing. APA style was followed with some inconsistencies. | Well-presented essay with minor errors in grammar or referencing. APA style is mostly correct. Good range of sources. | The essay is professionally presented with excellent grammar, spelling, and structure. APA 7th referencing is flawless. Wide range of high-quality sources used appropriately. |
