ART 45A UOM Reading Analysis Materiality of Mourning Essay

Question Description

Total two entry (1 and 2) Each entry write at least 200 words. Total at least 400 words, put answers in attached file template.

Please download and use Reading Response Template (See attached file) to format your responses.


ENTRY 1:

Note: this is a multi-part entry. Please read the interview between Lindsey Davis and artist Maya Lin, THEN spend time looking at the website for Lin’s project “What is Missing?”. Please make sure to clearly respond to both sources in your writing.

Part 1:

Title: “Dematerializing the Memorial” (Links to an external site.) interview with Maya Lin

Author: Lindsey Davis

Note: be very careful to attribute the interviewer (Lindsey Davis) and the interviewee (artist May Lin) correctly in your responses. Do not get them mixed up.

Part 2:

Please spend time looking around the What is Missing (Links to an external site.) project website (this is what the interview above is about)

ENTRY 2:

Title: Doris Salcedo: The Materiality of Mourning (see attached file)

“From the Artist” (pp. xvii-xix) Note: this essay is authored by Doris Salcedo herself

“Introduction” (pp. 1-13) Note: this Introduction is authored by Mary Schneider Enriquez

Author: Mary Schneider Enriquez

Criteria for Success:

Below is the rubric that will be used to evaluate your Reading Response Assignments. You may use this rubric and the guidelines above to self evaluate whether you have done an excellent, satisfactory or insufficient job completing the assignment.

Rubric

Reading Response Rubric (1)

Reading Response Rubric (1)

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

2 to >1.5 pts

Full Points

For both entries, student actively refers to at least 2 specifics from the reading(s) to support their reflections. It is clear through their discussion that they’ve read/viewed and engaged with ALL assigned material.

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Sufficient

1 to >0.5 pts

Room for Improvement

References to the reading content are somewhat vague, tangential, unrelated to the reading content or how it relates to art / one entry is missing

0.5 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

No clear references to the reading content / unclear that the student has truly read all materials

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal reflection, interpretation, analysis and synthesis

2 to >1.5 pts

Full Points

Student actively engages with the content of the reading(s) using personal reflection, analysis, interpretation, and/or synthesis, foregrounding their own original thinking about the reading.

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Sufficient

1 to >0.5 pts

Room for Improvement

Student’s response veers towards summarizing or telling what the reading was about / is vague, lacking in strong support details / lacks strong personal reflection / one entry is missing

0.5 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

No submissions / submissions are far too short / submissions do not respond clearly to the correct assigned readings

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper attribution, quoting, paraphrasing

1 to >0.75 pts

Full Points

Student consistently attributes sources by name and title accurately and properly quotes and paraphrases when referring to someone else’s words or ideas.

0.75 to >0.5 pts

Sufficient

0.5 to >0.25 pts

Room for Improvement

Student sometimes, but not consistently, quotes, paraphrases, and attributes by name the authors whose words/ideas they are sharing / one entry is missing

0.25 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

Student fails to properly attribute any sources by name/title, or to quote/paraphrase properly, thereby risking a situation of plagiarism.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

1 to >0.75 pts

Full Points

The BODY of the student’s response (not including headers, in-text citations, etc.) is between 200-300 words in length.

0.75 to >0.5 pts

Sufficient

0.5 to >0.25 pts

Room for Improvement

Both responses are under the 200 word minimum by up to 25 words (between 175-199 words) / one response is more that 25 words below 200 or missing

0.25 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

Both responses are less than 175 words in length / one or both entries are missing

1 pts

Total Points: 6

PreviousNex

The post ART 45A UOM Reading Analysis Materiality of Mourning Essay first appeared on Infinite Essays.