UMM2 Task 2: Midterm Objective Structured Clinical Experience (OSCE)

Requirements
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).

Identify the OSCE that corresponds with the first initial of your last name, according to the table in the task introduction. Schedule the OSCE with a live standardized patient by following the instructions in the attached “PMHNP Internship OSCE Information Guide.” Then, using the linked “PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation Template,” conduct the OSCE at the scheduled time by doing the following:

Video Recording

A. Demonstrate professionalism at all times during the virtual visit with the patient by doing the following:

1. Conduct the video visit in a private and appropriate location.
2. Wear professional attire.
3. Establish rapport with the patient at the start of the visit.
4. Provide an appropriate transition to the mental health status exam, including asking for permission to conduct the exam.
5. Ask the patient to restate the plan of care to check for understanding.

B. Provide a link to the Panopto video you recorded while conducting the mental health examination with the standardized patient.

Note: For instructions on how to access and use Panopto, use the ”Panopto How-To Videos” web link provided in the Web Links section. To access Panopto’s website, navigate to the web link titled ”Panopto Access” and then choose to log in using the “WGU” option. If prompted, log in using your WGU student portal credentials, and then it will forward you to Panopto’s website.

Note: You must ensure that both you and the standardized patient are recorded and able to be heard on the recording. If either of you cannot be heard, your submission will not be evaluated, and you will need to retake the OSCE.

Note: To submit your recording, upload it to the D348 Panopto Drop Box titled “Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Clinical Internship I – UMM2 |D348.” Once the recording has been uploaded and processed in Panopto’s system, retrieve the URL of the recording from Panopto and copy and paste it into the Links option. Upload the remaining task requirements using the Attachments option.

Documentation

C. Complete the linked “PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation” for the patient visit by documenting the following:

1. Patient information
2. Chief complaint
3. A written narrative of the history of present illness that includes OLDCARTS-generated data from the patient
4. Medical history
5. Surgical history

Note: If a patient does not have a surgical history, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

6. Previous hospitalizations—medical/surgical and psychiatric

Note: If a patient does not have any previous hospitalizations, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

7. Current medications

Note: If a patient does not currently take any over-the-counter or prescription medications, vitamins, or supplements, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

8. Any known allergies

Note: If a patient does not have any known drug, environmental, or food allergies, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

9. Family medical history and family psychiatric history

Note: If a family member type or history is not applicable to the patient, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

10. Social history

Note: If a social history category is not applicable to the patient, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

11. Past psychiatric history

Note: If past psychiatric history is not applicable to the patient, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

12. A focused review of medical and psychiatric systems pertinent to the present illness

Note: If a system is not pertinent to the present illness, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

13. A focused mental status examination pertinent to the present illness
14. One diagnostic or medical lab

a. Provide your rationale for the lab or diagnostic that includes evidence from the patient interview and one scholarly source.

15. The DSM-5-TR diagnosis

Note: If a secondary diagnosis is not applicable, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

16. Three differential diagnoses

a. Provide your rationale for each differential diagnosis, including evidence from the patient interview and one scholarly source for each rationale.

Note: All differential diagnoses must be distinct from the primary diagnosis.

17. An evidence-based treatment plan as a written narrative which includes the following:

a. Two SMART psychotherapeutic intervention goals and one objective per goal for monitoring patient progress

b. Your rationale for each treatment, including evidence from the patient interview and one scholarly source for each rationale

18. One pharmacological treatment, if necessary

a. Provide your rationale that includes evidence from the patient interview and one scholarly source.

Note: If no pharmacological treatment is necessary, note this in your submission and provide evidence to support your rationale.

19. Two interdisciplinary team members and your rationale for each
20. A patient follow-up plan that includes emergency services, if necessary

Note: If emergency services are not necessary, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

21. A referral, if necessary

Note: If a referral is not necessary, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

22. Psychoeducation that includes the following:

• Prescribed medication
• Disease management
• Safety interventions (e.g., self-harm prevention, medication safety, support system strategies, domestic environment safety)

Note: If safety interventions are not necessary, state this in the PMHNP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation.

• Recommendation for higher level of care if patient does not improve

D. Review the Panopto video of the OSCE you conducted and write a self-reflection of your performance as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.

Note: Your reflection could include a self-evaluation of interviewing techniques, any additional questions or topics you would have liked to address with the patient, anything you did well or would like to improve upon, etc.

E. Discuss any changes you would make to your overall assessment or treatment plan if the patient were in a different setting (i.e., inpatient versus outpatient or outpatient versus inpatient).

Note: The focus should be on how your assessment or treatment plan would be different if the patient acuity was the opposite of what was presented in the OSCE scenario (i.e., higher acuity to lower acuity or vice versa).

F. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

G. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

Patient , native of SA died after being given the wrong medication.
Son was English speaking informed the nurses that his mother had had a bad reaction to the drug in America.
The pharmacist ( native) of SA Dispensed the medicine dispite it been highlighted by the computer as an allergy. Pharmacist overrode the warning and dispensed.
The prescribing doctor(native) was informed of the allergy alert by the nurses( foreign). Refused to change the prescription for alternative medicine. Doctor told the nurses that if they don’t give the drug he will make them loose their job .
So the nurses escalated to manager who was threatened with job lose . The drug was given and the patient died after 4 minutes.
The case went to the Hospital management and the nurses (4)had to pay compensation for their actions to the family .

XS4039 Food Safety Management Systems CW Assignment 2 Brief 2025-26 | UCLan

XS4039 UCLan Coursework Assessment Brief

UCLan Coursework Assessment Brief		2025/26
Module Title: Food Safety Management Systems Module Code: XS4039		Level 7
Assignment 2: HACCP Project Management	This assessment is worth 50% of the overall module mark

The introduction of HACCP-based food safety management systems is often achieved through a change management process.   This involves consideration of the existing systems and resources within the food business, identification of gaps and project planning for the development and implementation of effective food safety management procedures.  In order to develop a practical project plan, the barriers to HACCP application and food safety culture considerations for workable solutions need to be understood.

Case Study Company

Potter’s Foods (see Supporting Document: Potter’s Foods case study) is a medium-sized manufacturer of chilled ready meals based in the north of England.  The company has identified the need to develop a HACCP-based food safety management system and you have been given the job of managing this project.

Case Study – Assessment Requirements:

Considering the case study company information provided and using literature on barriers to HACCP application and food safety culture as a guide, discuss the food safety culture and identify the barriers to effective HACCP/food safety management system implementation at the case study factory.  Prepare a critical report demonstrating how you would manage the change process at this company necessary to overcome barriers, mature the food safety culture and implement HACCP effectively.  Prepare a project plan, with key targets and milestones, showing how the process will be accomplished.

Your submission should include:

• Critical Report
• Project Plan

Note: Although specialist project planning software can be helpful, it is not essential to use this in your submission.  Project plans can effectively be represented using standard office software such as MS Word, PowerPoint, or Excel.

Additional Points to Consider

• What steps are involved in HACCP development, implementation and maintenance?
• What information is known about barriers to HACCP/food safety management systems implementation and how to overcome them?
• What barriers do you anticipate at Potter’s Foods?
• Which model from food safety culture literature would you adopt to provide an assessment of the food safety culture at Potter’s foods?
• What challenges/perceived barriers do you anticipate to maturing the food safety culture at Potter’s foods?
• Are there any additional systems and procedures that need to be developed at Potter’s Foods to support the application of HACCP?
• Do these need to be developed first or can the HACCP development progress alongside?
• What are the key stages needed to get HACCP working effectively at Potter’s Foods?
• What resources and timescales will you need to achieve your solution?

The following Learning Outcomes (LOs) will be assessed in Assignment 2. 

3.    Evaluate critically the key concepts and theories of food safety culture and managing projects and change in relation to development and implementation of effective HACCP-based food safety management programmes. 
4.    Apply some of the tools and techniques for managing projects and change in the context of the design and implementation of a HACCP project.

XS4039 Marking criteria

HACCP Project planning and management skills (40 marks)

· Provide clear and accurate understanding of barriers to HACCP application and food safety culture · Able to evaluate barriers to effective HACCP implementation · Provide innovative solutions through additional systems and procedures to support application of HACCP · Able to design clear and feasible project plan to manage change process effectively

PREPARATION FOR THE ASSESSMENT · A briefing on Assignment 2 will be provided on 01 October 2025 followed by an assignment support session on 10 December 2025.  · The report and project plan will be marked anonymously. Please do not include your name / ID number in your report during submission. · Ensure all appropriate sources are correctly cited and use as broad a base of information sources as you can, ensuring that the information is up to date. · LINK to reading list
RELEASE DATES AND HAND IN DEADLINE · Assessment Release date: 17 September 2025 · Assessment Deadline Date and time: 11:59 pm, 8 January 2026 (Please note that this is the final time you can submit – not the time to submit) · Your feedback/feed forward and mark for this assessment will be provided on: 29 January 2026.
SUBMISSION DETAILS Word count: Not more than 2,000 words (+/- 10%) excluding figures, tables and references.  Please indicate the actual word count at the end of your report. Relevant appendices with appropriate citations can be used to support your submission. Coursework Cover sheet: Please use Assignment 2: HACCP Project Management cover sheet in Assignment 2 folder. Referencing style: Harvard referencing style Where and how to submit:   Please submit your report including project plan as ONE file to Turnitin in Assignment 2 folder.
HELP AND SUPPORT · Tutor support will be provided for those who need further guidance. Please request an appointment on Starfish. Alternatively, please email me if you have any questions. · For support with using library resources, please contact Jane Bruney (JBruney@uclan.ac.uk) or SubjectLibrarians@uclan.ac.uk. You will find links to lots of useful resources in the My Library tab on Blackboard. · If you have not yet made the university aware of any disability, specific learning difficulty, long-term health or mental health condition, please complete a Disclosure Form.  The Inclusive Support team will then contact to discuss reasonable adjustments and support relating to any disability.  For more information, visit the Inclusive Support site. · To access mental health and wellbeing support, please complete our online referral form. Alternatively, you can email wellbeing@uclan.ac.uk, call 01772 893020 or visit our UCLan Wellbeing Service pages for more information. · If you have any other query or require further support you can contact The <i>, The Student Information and Support Centre.  Speak with us for advice on accessing all the University services as well as the Library services. Whatever your query, our expert staff will be able to help and support you. For more information , how to contact us and our opening hours visit Student Information and Support Centre. · If you have any valid mitigating circumstances that mean you cannot meet an assessment submission deadline and you wish to request an extension, you will need to apply online prior to the deadline.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this assessment brief is correct at time of publication. In the unlikely event that any changes are deemed necessary, they will be communicated clearly via e-mail and a new version of this assessment brief will be circulated.	Versio

BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values Assignment 2 Brief 2025-26, Semester 1 & 2

Assignment Brief: BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values 2025-26, Semester 1 & 2 

Assignment 02	Individual Report
Word Limit or equivalent (e.g. time)	1500 words
Weighting	30%
Learning Outcomes Assessed	Learning Outcomes: LO1: Apply and critically analyse current ethical and responsible management concepts and different forms of sustainability along with their impact on organisations. LO4: Demonstrate the ability to analyse, synthesise and present qualitative and quantitative data, both in an individual and group environment, by the application of methodological techniques.
Submission date	3pm on Friday 9 January 2026
Feedback date	All assignment feedback will be issued on the 20th working day following the submission deadline. Feedback will be released on: Friday 6 February

What do I need to do to make a success of this assignment?

Assignment task(s): Apply appropriate frameworks and models* reviewed on the course as necessary to complete the following 3 assignment components: 1. Using appropriate frameworks identify up to 3 key issues relevant to the case study business, justify their importance and discuss the complexities involved in resolving them (30%). 2. Apply frameworks, refer to expert opinion, and use evidence from the case to explore potential options to address the key issues (40%). 3. Present recommendations to the Board in terms of a balanced improvement strategy to take the business forward (30%).   Your work will be graded against 5 criteria which are shown on the grading matrix. Your success in each criterion will determine your final grade. 1. The objective identification of the key issues, the rationale for selecting them and the demonstration of understanding the complexities involved in resolving them 2. Application of frameworks and the use of relevant and credible research to support work, and the filtering of potential options to identify recommendations to address issues. 3. The quality of recommendations to take the business forward, credibility of recommendations, likelihood of success, relevance, and detail of the implementation plan presented and the use of relevant and credible research to support work. 4. The academic skills demonstrated including the presentation of the report, use of English language, spelling, grammar, punctuation, quality of expression. 5. Credibility and relevance of references used, and the accuracy of the presentation. *The frameworks/models reviewed on the course are tools for analysis so must be used to add value to your work. ‘Used’ means you must apply information to the framework/model to generate new information. The findings of the framework/model (i.e., what it tells you) must be discussed in the text and considered in relation to relevant, credible academic research to draw credible judgements which are required in your assignment.

How should I present my work?

You are required to submit your work as a business report. This means it is written in the third person and should be fully referenced using the University Harvard referencing system, support is available through the library University of Worcester Referencing.  Please note: No grading matrix is to be attached to this assignment  Use this format to present your work as professional as you can: On the title page, list the following: Module name and code Student number Submission date Assignment Number/Title GenAI Declaration Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction Body Conclusion References (use the University Harvard referencing system, support is available through the library Referencing) Appendices

How can I obtain guidance on my assignment?

Assignment support will be provided will take place during taught sessions across both semesters. Please check the Module Outline for the dates of Assignment Briefs, Assignment Support Sessions and Tutorials. During the Assignment Briefs, students will receive detailed information about the assessment criteria, expectations, and guidelines and during the Assignment Support Sessions, feed-forwards support will be available. In tutorials students will receive personal feedback on their work. Tutorials must be booked, and work provided to the Tutor before the review. It is crucial for all students to attend the briefings, support sessions and tutorials to ensure they understand the requirements and can ask any questions they may have. You can submit an assessment plan of your work in progress or a short piece of text (no longer than one side of A4) to enable you to obtain guidance on the overall structure and direction of your assignment. You should submit this at least 3 days before your Tutorial enable you to review and address feedback provided to develop your work. In addition, you may ask questions about the assignments and your work in class each week. Participation is highly recommended in some or all of these opportunities to obtain help with your work as it offers valuable insights and guidance from the tutors. Students who used the help available got significantly higher grades in 2023-24 and 2024-25.

How and when do I hand my assignment in?

Your work must be word-processed/typed and should clearly show your student number.  You should submit your work by the 3pm deadline on Friday 9 January 2026. You should submit your work to Blackboard which is available via MyDay. You are required to keep a copy of work handed in. See the separate Assignment Support Information document on Blackboard for help on how to submit or what to do if you are having trouble submitting your assignment.

How will my assignment be marked?

Specific marking criteria for your assignment is provided in the Grading Matrix within this document. You are strongly advised to check your completed work against the Grading Matrix to ensure have completed all areas required before you submit it. You should also ensure you adhere to the word limit / word count stated in your assessment brief document, details of which can be found in the University’s Assessment Policy

Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI)

We are aware of the benefits that the responsible use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools can bring, however, where it is deemed that there has been inappropriate or unethical use of GenAI to generate assignments either wholly or in part, this is classed as Academic Misconduct and will result in Academic Misconduct proceedings being brought. Within BMGT3221 Ass 03 you can use GenAI* to 1) Suggest a structure for your work. However, using a standard Powerpoint presentation following the assignment requirements will save you time and effort. 2) Edit less than 40% of your group’s presentation to improve your language. If you use GenAI to edit your text, please ensure you read your work carefully before you submit it so that it makes sense. GenAI frequently uses words that have unclear meanings and/or do not go together in correct sentences. It is recommended that you use Word Editor to check spelling, grammar etc as they do not overwrite your work or change its meaning as Gen AI does.  IN BMGT3221 GenAI may not be used to, 3) Generate ideas – presenting your views are the key to obtaining a good grade on this assignment. GenAI cannot replace your personal views so must not be used. 4) Create content – no written work, images, graphs, or data can be created artificially, the tutors want to know what you can do. GenAI frequently provides you with misinformation which will result in a failed assignment. Using it will have wasted your time. 5) Create a reference list – you must only use articles and journals to support your work that, a. are real** b. you have read all the way through c. are available via the Library search facility d. contain the information you say they do e. are cited in the text with a correct reference in the reference list.   These BMGT3221 rules for the use of GenAI must be followed. They are not replaced by the advice provided by the University. This Artificial Intelligence webpage only gives information about Gen AI. It does not tell you how you are allowed to use AI on BMGT3221. * All reports submitted must include a Gen AI declaration: · If you use GenAI to create a structure for your work you must declare it under the title on the first page of your report. The suggested declaration is “I have used GenAI (+ name the platform used) to………. This has changed my work by… (add how Gen AI has changed the report you have submitted)”. · If you have not used Gen AI, the suggested declaration is “I have not used Gen AI in the creation of my work, in the editing of my work or to check my spelling, grammar, etc. ** Remember you have been given a reading list which contains credible, peer reviewed academic sources. Using them rather than searching for sources using AI or Google will save you time and effort and you will now they have not been made up. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT WE WILL BE HOLDING WORK REVIEWS AND YOU MAY BE ASKED TO DEFEND YOUR WORK. If you’re unsure and want some advice, please contact your module tutor, module leader or personal academic tutor for guidance.

BMGT3221 Assessment Criteria

GRADE	Criteria 1: Objective identification of key issues, the rationale selecting them and understanding of the complexities involved in resolving them	Criteria 2: Application of frameworks, use of relevant and credible research to support work, and filtering of potential options to identify recommendations to address issues.	Criteria 3: Quality of recommendations to take the business forward, credibility of recommendations, likelihood of success, relevance, and detail of implementation plan.	Criteria 4: Academic skills demonstrated: presentation of report, use of English language, spelling, grammar, punctuation, quality of expression.	Criteria 5: Accuracy, credibility, and relevance of references used. Gen AI Declaration.
A	Key issues are selected and expertly described with evidence Inherent complexities concerning the issues are discussed. Reflective and balanced discussion on associated interacting skilfully with expert opinion where appropriate.	Draw from a full range of sources to identify potential options that may address the selected issues.   Critical engagement supported by further analysis where required to form a credible personal judgement which is clearly and persuasively argued.	Recommend a well-reasoned, credible & balanced strategy as a natural progression from previous discussion and findings.  Discuss potential complexities, implications, and limitations of adopting the strategy. Propose an approach to monitor successful implementation and mitigation of associated risks.	Excellent format with content presented articulately and persuasively.  Logical, reflective, and creative development of argument.   Effectively and efficiently conveys understanding and meaning through accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar.	Referencing drawn from a wide variety of quality sources and accurately presented using Harvard method.    A Gen AI declaration has been clearly made and is honest.
B	Key issues are described clearly and accurately with supporting rationale. Associated challenges are discussed reflectively with appropriate reference to expert opinion.	Sensible potential options identified drawing from a range of sources. Review options using appropriate techniques and synthesising relevant evidence and opinion.  Develop personal view on appropriate way forward.	A clear & balanced strategy recommendation is derived from previous discussion and analysis.  Limitations and risks of the proposed way forward are identified and discussed.  Proposals for successful implementation provided.	Strong presentation both in form and content. Logical and mostly reflective progression of argument.   Conveys understanding and meaning very well through accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar.	Appropriate quality references presented using correct Harvard format.   A Gen AI declaration has been made and is honest.
C	Key issues together with associated challenges to resolving them are described with appropriate rationale and with some reference to expert opinion.	Clearly identify potential strategic options.  Apply expert opinion and techniques to review the options. Draw reasonable intermediate conclusions.	Evidence of argument progression as a suitable strategy is identified and clearly communicated.  Description of risks/challenges associated with implementing the strategy.	Clearly presented paper both in form and content.  Generally coherent development of themes – more descriptive than reflective.   Appropriately conveys understanding and meaning through mostly accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar.	Adequate references integrated. Generally credible academic sources are used to support your work. Generally correct Harvard method. A Gen AI declaration has been made which is mostly clear and honest.
D	Some relevant issues are selected and described showing a basic understanding of the case and their relevance and complexity.  An attempt is made to involve expert opinion.	Basic and single option response to key issues.  Some discussion and attempt to apply a framework and expert opinion. Description of findings with safe or limited conclusions.	Some recommendations for future are proposed – these are basic and safe in nature with limited connection to previous analysis or evaluation. Simplistic approach to implementation. Some misunderstanding.	Generally presented in the appropriate format with reasonable clarity.  Much unsubstantiated discussion, descriptive and safe conclusions.   Adequately conveys understanding and meaning through generally accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar although some errors exist.	Inadequate number of sources used to support your work. Few credible academic sources are used to support your work. Many references are taken from generic websites and subjective online sources. Major errors in the Harvard format. A Gen AI declaration has been made and is honest
E-F	Description of the issues is weak/poor.  Limited evidence that complexity of issues is recognised or understood.	Poor or simplistic options provided. Unsubstantiated, unconnected, and descriptive. Little evidence of discussion or further evaluation. Some misunderstanding.	Limited, and/or inappropriate, and or unsubstantiated proposals offered, if at all.   Lack of understanding	Poor and inappropriate presentation format.  Lack of clarity.   Descriptive responses. Inadequately/very poorly conveys understanding and meaning through written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Serious/very serious errors in use of English exist.	Lack of referencing demonstrated within your work. A Gen AI declaration has not been made where required Information is taken from non-academic sources and subjective online sources. References included in the reference list but not cited in the text or cited sources are not included in the reference list. Major errors in referencing format. Some plagiarism demonstrated*. A Gen AI declaration has not been made.
G	Description of the issues is non-existent.  No complexity of issues is understood.	No potential options for improvement are presented. Significant lack of understanding is demonstrated.	No recommendations are presented. Significant lack of understanding is demonstrated.	Severe lack of clarity. Understanding and meaning not conveyed due to inaccurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Major errors exist Almost no attempt to reference relevant works. Use of fake references*.	No references used. Extensive plagiarism demonstrated* Fake references detected* A Gen AI declaration has not been made.
H / NS	Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.	Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.	Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.	Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.	Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-

3-to-4-page paper and PICOT template Details: Draft three PICOT questions for clinical issues of your interest and submit them for approval. Download and fill out the PICOT template Download template to submit with this paper.
The PICOT Questions This assignment should be 3-4 pages (not including the title or references pages) and shall consist of the following components: Title Page: In APA format Introduction: include a summary of the primary intent of your paper Problem Statement: Fully describe the primary problem you are addressing as part of your potential EBP Project. Integrate contemporary/scholarly evidence (no more than five years old) to support the need for change. Improved PICOT Questions: Focused, searchable, and answerable PICOT questions should include the following: Population of Interest: Describe your population of interest. Intervention of Interest: Describe your intervention of interest. Evidence: Evidence from the literature must be present with at least 3 scholarly references to support the evidence-based practice intervention. Comparison of Interest: Describe your comparison of interest. Outcome of Interest: Describe your outcome of interest. Is it measurable? Is the tool that you will use to measure outcomes proven reliable and valid? Timeframe: Briefly identify the timeframe associated with the implementation phase of your project. Conclusion: Summarize the key points you made within your paper without introducing any new information in this section. References Page: In APA format

o Why is pursuing a doctoral degree in Higher Education important to you? Share personal and professional goals you hope to achieve through participation in Higher Education doctoral program. o Earning a degree online requires self-discipline and motivation. Give an example from your life that illustrates your commitment to continued intellectual and professional development. o Share an experience you possess conducting research and your potential to contribute to the field of Higher Education. o Discuss a tentative higher education topic you would like to research in this doctoral program. Keep in mind that you are not committed to studying this topic exactly, but demonstrate to the admissions committee that you have a clear direction in mind. o Participation in a doctoral program is a significant commitment in time and cognitive energy. Address how will you prepare for and address the challenges to obtain a School-Work-Life balance.

For this week’s assignment, you will evaluate criminal justice in selected countries. Since mens rea refers to criminal intent, the concept of guilty but insane sounds like an oxymoron to most people. Chapters 1 and 3 in the course text discuss international perspectives on criminal law. Find additional credible sources to research criminal intent in Great Britain and Norway. The Daniel McNaughton and Anders Breivik cases might be helpful. These cases are notorious for the guilty but insane defense in Great Britain and Norway.

For your assignment

• Assess how criminal intent in these two countries differs from the United States when it comes to an insanity defense.
• Describe at least one case in each country (Great Britain, Norway, and the United States) where this defense has been used successfully.

The paper

• Must be at least three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages)
• Must use at least three credible sources in addition to the course text.

Bias does not only affect research; it also influences how we lead, listen, and communicate. Use a reputable search tool to review common forms of bias such as confirmation bias, cultural bias, gender bias, or sampling bias. You may use Business Source Complete through myDHA, Google Scholar, PubMed, or other respected academic search tools.

Choose three types of bias that resonate with you. Reflect on how becoming more aware of these biases might affect the way you communicate as a leader. How might they shape your perceptions, your tone, or your credibility with others?

Note: Although these forms of bias are often discussed in research settings, they are just as important in everyday communication. Bias influences how we listen, what we choose to say, and how others perceive our leadership. Recognizing your own biases is an important step toward becoming a more effective and self-aware communicator.

Your main post should be 250 to 500 words. Each response post should be 150 to 200 words and should show thoughtful engagement with your classmates’ ideas

1.    The four principles of biomedical ethics, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, have often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. Based on your worldview, how do you rank the importance of each of the four principles in order to protect the health and safety of diverse populations?

2.    According to the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) that informs us about the nature of God, where would you find comfort and hope in the midst of sickness and disease?

3.    Based on your clinical experiences with those who are dying, how have these experiences shaped your view of death and impacted your ability to demonstrate the qualities of empathy?

4.    Because everyone's life is deemed valuable to God, the choice of suicide or euthanasia contradicts this and is therefore considered sin. Do you agree? Why or why not?

5.    How does your own definition of spiritual care compare with the Christian definition of spiritual care?

6.    In terms of intervention and spiritual care, how do you support a patient facing an ethical dilemma, with consideration for their worldview? If you were that patient, what care would you want provided?

cultural assessment is part of the foundation for every patient's care plan. It provides valuable data for setting mutual goals, planning care, intervening, and evaluating the care (Andrews et al., 2019). Cultural assessment systematically examines individuals, families, groups, and communities' health-related cultural beliefs, values, and practices.

Instructions:

1. Read the one (1) statement below, then answer the questions that follow:
   1.  Statement #1:  The nurse is completing a spiritual assessment of a newly admitted patient.
      • What would be some essential areas to discuss during a spiritual assessment?
      • Discuss what patients most value from a nurse caring for their spiritual needs as they provide health care.
      • List educational needs.
   2.  Statement #2:  Cultural Influences are relevant to everyone.
      • Discuss aspects of culture that are relevant to health assessment.
      • How is culture important during the health assessment?
2. Initial Post: Post your response with:
   • At least 100-150 words 
   • Writing free of grammatical, spelling, &/or punctuation errors.
   • Cite your references with the APA style guideLinks to an external site. (not included in the length of the post.